Assigment Criteria

1. Depth and quality of the topic study:

   • 1 point – the topic is left largely unaddressed

   • 2 points – the topic is partially developed

   • 3 points – the topic is thoroughly developed, the author has revealed deep knowledge on the topic

2. Quality of information used, variety of resources:

   • 1 points – min information sources (1-2) is employed; the sources are not specialized and/or intended for mass audience

   • 2 points – the range of information sources fails to provide the required depth and objectivity

   • 3 points – sufficient number of specialized sources is employed

3. Validity of the technology proposed:

   • 1 point – the technology proposed is irrelevant to the essence of the project, or bases on inadequate reasoning

   • 2 points – the technology proposed is basically correspondent to the topic, but the reasoning is either insufficiently developed, or fragmentary

   • 3 points – the work is coherent; the technology proposed is adequate, effective and sufficiently reasoned

4. Presentation skills:

   • 1 point - the work contains unexplained specific terms and reveals incoherence; the material is fragmentary and logically disconnected.

   • 2 points - main notions are given clearly and coherently, still certain meanings are blurred or subject to misinterpretation.

   • 3 points – presentation is logically arranged and given clearly and coherently, a holistic, unambiguous and understandable image is formed, structures and connections are described in compliance with dialectical logic.